Unanswered questions

[Faith No More]

Ok my turn, I talk you listen. I am asking you to provide proof that the mutation being identified in your arguement is indeed a mutation. The reason being because both you and faith no more seem to think or rather are arguing front the position that the current plants being discussed are progressing in their evolutionary scale and have mutated into something more adaptable, some big next step. When my arguement centers itself in the other direction. In that these 'mutations' are preexisting, and evolution of plant life is taking plants away from the ability to process higher amounts of solar energy. Any one with a reef tank who has to buy a 2x or 3x uv bulb can tell you it turbo charges algae growth. Along with reef growth. Algae being one of the oldest and forms of plant life on the planet. While recent additions like cultivated house plants are almost allergic to direct sunlight.

I asked you to prove your mutation theory because you can't. These are not mutations. The mutations are found in the plants who can no longer be over exposed to sunlight.

I think you fail to grasp the implications of your original claim, which was that plants absorbing more energy from artificial light sources disproves evolution because it cannot account for it. To prove you wrong, I do not have to point to the specific mutation or how it came about. All I have to do is demonstrate a scenario in which evolution can account for it, and not only was I able to do so, Esquillax was able to give another. So, all your whining about not knowing the exact mutation and having faith in evolution is just empty posturing that shows you either refuse to admit your were wrong, or you just simply can't understand that you have been proven incorrect.

Regardless, don't attempt to lower our position to being on par with your unevidenced delusions. It's pathetic.