X-P you have learned a valuable lesson about our stable of theists. When confronted with a simple question such as:
They will do whatever they can to derail the thread into their customary pseudo-philosophical bible babble so as to avoid facing the reality of the question.
I wish the mods would start splitting these digressions off - they do this all the time at FRDB and it keeps the original threads on target while still giving the clowns plenty of opportunity to make fools of themselves.
Anyway, back to your point why is it that even the books they agree on have been edited by men at various times? Agreeing on the books is fine but there is ample evidence of the editing that has gone on. Why couldn't "god" get his story straight the first time?
Quote:My first question for them is which Bible do you mean?
They will do whatever they can to derail the thread into their customary pseudo-philosophical bible babble so as to avoid facing the reality of the question.
I wish the mods would start splitting these digressions off - they do this all the time at FRDB and it keeps the original threads on target while still giving the clowns plenty of opportunity to make fools of themselves.
Anyway, back to your point why is it that even the books they agree on have been edited by men at various times? Agreeing on the books is fine but there is ample evidence of the editing that has gone on. Why couldn't "god" get his story straight the first time?
