The redneck strike again.

[Cyberman]

There are many many ways to cook an egg so the taste may differ but at the end an egg is an egg.
You can create a myriad of intellectual extravaganza but at the end you still are Mr. Stimbo with your degree of consciousness.
The radio example was all about understanding that until you set up a system in which you can grasp the treasure within you may not know that it exist.

"God" is a radio station like a cooked egg? You strive for deepities but your water wings get in the way.

But that's all beside the point, since you're trying to shift your burden of proof. It's not up to me to "set up a system in which you can grasp the treasure within you may not know that it exist" - it's up to you to demonstrate. with actual evidence, that such treasure is even there to be found in the first place. Until you've done that most basic thing, the discussion (such as it is) cannot profitably proceed.

Where is the equivalent of the radio for "God", and how can you possibly know that it's that character you claim to perceive? I realise you're not actually in the business of forming cogent, or even coherent, sentences, but please don't give me your usual mouldy brand of platitudes and false bonhomie. I just ate.

Luckily you are not a real pistolero otherwise i would already be dead.

It's almost cute how you still haven't grasped my avatar choice yet.

There are many many drops of water around but sooner or later they all end up in the big ocean so it is not just me that perceive how the system work in this way.

Radioes, eggs, waterdrops - I'm sure you can me much more vague if you really tried.

It is all about the degree of consciousness that allow to perceive how the system works.
With little consciousness it is obvious that nothing is clear.
Why don't you ask yourself why there is a force within that push you to learn more all the time?
It is father Christmas or someone else?

Ah - I think we've finally got you to admit the source of your pseudo-intellectual inanities. What justification do you have for thinking that this force of which you speak is a 'someone'? Don't you see that by projecting the answer of "Father Xmas" onto me, in an attempt at ridicule, does not deflect scorn from your own arguments? We can see through your smokescreen; unlike you, it's not very thick.