I feel kind of gullible, Rev.
I actually had hopes (albeit small ones) that in these threads (for which you spent weeks preparing for, mind you) you were going to engage and actually debate. You were told in the other threads why Answers in Genesis, ICR, and Creationproof are not credible sources. These sites are not concerned with anything other than confirming their own bias. There is no science done there. And yet they are the first, and I'll add, only thing you responded with.
You told us you would engage. You told us no more one-line responses and cliched quips.
I guess you are really just a liar.
I actually had hopes (albeit small ones) that in these threads (for which you spent weeks preparing for, mind you) you were going to engage and actually debate. You were told in the other threads why Answers in Genesis, ICR, and Creationproof are not credible sources. These sites are not concerned with anything other than confirming their own bias. There is no science done there. And yet they are the first, and I'll add, only thing you responded with.
You told us you would engage. You told us no more one-line responses and cliched quips.
I guess you are really just a liar.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---