Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Revelation777]

there is no such thing as an unbias reliable source. If you think your avg. scientist or professor is not bias, HA!HA!HA! Do you know that most universities if a professor even hints that they believe in creationism that they will be brow beaten to the point where they will be forced to resign. Watch Ben Stein's movie Expelled, No Intelligence Allowed.

I've said this to you in a thread before, but this line of reasoning is completely ridiculous; science works on evidence and demonstration, and the kind of demonstration that would prove or even hint at creation would overturn so much of modern science that it would be Nobel Prize material, not to mention all the money and fame one would receive from religious organizations. Look back though the history of science, Rev; the people who propose and prove revolutionary theories are lauded, and the only censure comes from the church, who used to burn such heretics...

It is possible that the so-called evidence is deemed evidence because of how one perceives it? What might be overwhelming evidence for one scientist is very questionable to another. I am sure I know which one you would refer to.