Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 4:38 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontology of God--Theological Noncognitivist View
#46
RE: Ontology of God--Theological Noncognitivist View
Quote:I see. So you saying: "You really don't get it? Come on, I think you're more intelligent than you're letting on." was not you saying that I'm not intelligent enough to understand your point thus proving that you were right and I was wrong... the Ad Hom Fallacy?

It absolutely was not. If that is what I wished to say, I would have said it. You are deliberately avoiding answering my questions. I was hoping that you were doing so my mistake, but obviously not.

Quote:Blimey your going to take my crown as most wriggleworthy member!

What question have I wriggled around? I feel I have been quite direct.

Quote:This is the usual silliness we see. I believe it's brought about by the lack of coherent argument.

It is just as silly and incoherent as Yahweh.

Quote:You mean the question about how it has to exist first?

No, I meant exactly what I said:

Knight Wrote:You have failed to answer the questions of my previous post.

If I HAVE to point them out:

Quote:Please tell me more about this "non object." If it is not objective, how can we possibly know anything about it, even the state of its existence?

Quote:There is a unicorn living on the moon. This unicorn is capable of anaerobic respiration, which is why it does not die. It is also immaterial, which explains why we cannot see it or detect it in any way.

The words in the above context make sense, but in reality no such being can be shown to exist. Does that mean we just assume it does? Why? Even if such a being does exist, if it is immaterial how does it have any meaning? It certainly would not be able to interact with the universe in any way, being completely immaterial. It would seem that even if God exists, believing in him is completely meaningless. If this is the God you believe in, fine. No one will ever be able to prove you wrong.

Quote:As far as I can see... you haven't recovered from my first response in this thread which destroys your position.

I responded to your first response. You did not come anywhere close to destroying my position.
Why must Christians always declare victory prematurely?
Live and love life

[Image: KnightBanner.png]
Liberty and justice for all
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Ontology of God--Theological Noncognitivist View - by Knight - January 15, 2010 at 6:23 pm
RE: Ontology of God--Theological Noncognitivist View - by Knight - January 16, 2010 at 9:38 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A contradiction in the liberal view of gender shadow 64 12279 September 18, 2017 at 3:40 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Devil's advocate for why ontology is meaningless and vacuous. Edwardo Piet 76 6857 September 12, 2016 at 3:48 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Cynical view of happiness. paulpablo 77 7827 July 10, 2016 at 9:55 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  My View on Belief vs. Knowledge GrandizerII 29 7325 March 4, 2015 at 7:12 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
Question One thing that makes you doubt your own world view? Tea Earl Grey Hot 9 2746 July 14, 2013 at 4:06 pm
Last Post: Something completely different



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)