RE: Ontology of God--Theological Noncognitivist View
January 17, 2010 at 7:31 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2010 at 7:32 am by theVOID.)
(January 17, 2010 at 7:20 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(January 17, 2010 at 7:14 am)theVOID Wrote:(January 17, 2010 at 7:08 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Then you aren't thinking Zen.
You want to provide some then?
You want me to think for you!?
We both know i was talking about the logical proof you claim exists, now either deliver or admit you can't provide it.
Quote:(January 17, 2010 at 7:14 am)theVOID Wrote:(January 17, 2010 at 7:02 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(January 17, 2010 at 1:19 am)theVOID Wrote: Fr0d0 has unknowingly created a God of the gaps argument it would seem, for if to find out what God is you must find out what God is not, and nothing ever discovered by man is God, then God is entirely dependent on what we don't know, and the more we learn isn't God there are less and less attributes than can be God.
Your talking from your anus here VOID. Wrong subject dude... science class in down the hall.
You want to explain why for a change rather than being dismissive as you usually are?
Nothing in science proves the attributes of God false. Please stump up and show me how. What we know/ don't know in the field of science impacts zero on our thoughts on God.
Never claimed they did, that was not in any way what my post was about.
You claim you need to know what God isn't to know what God is and by that logic God could be anything that we don't already know he is not. It therefore stands to reason that the more things we know aren't god, the less things he could be, and considering the fact that you cannot prove anything that he IS, you have a god of the gaps argument.
.
