Atheism is unreasonable

[His_Majesty]

This god is alleged to be perfectly merciful; he is also alleged to have created Hell. Some conundrum, that.

I don't think omnibenovelence necessarily entails omni-mercifulness.

This god is alleged to be all-knowing; he is also alleged to have created Satan to test men. Ought not an all-knowing god know the answer of the test already? And in that case, what use might he have in creating Satan -- unless he is evil himself and creates Satan in order to have a scapegoat?

God doesn't test us because he wants to know what will will do. He tests us for our own learning and understanding. If you fail the test that would be an inkling for you to say "ok, there are some areas that I need to work on"...and at the end of the day, the goal is to get better, and you get better by falling, getting back up, and learning so that when if the situation should arise again, you are better equipped in your response.

This god is alleged to be both perfectly good and all powerful, yet he has created cancer

Cancer and other ailment is a result of the body being once good, and now in a state of constant decay. Second law of thermodynamics.

, and doomed every human to death for the sins of the first two.

True Christians are not doomed to death...true Christians are saved from death.

This god is alleged to be omnipresent -- yet you cannot find hide nor hair of him.

Um...of course you can't hide from something/someone that is omnipresent.

I could go on; ask if you see fit.

No, just quit while you are behind lol.

You're clearly ignorant of the fact that amino acids have been found in comets, and meteorites.

They clearly form up in nature, unless you're wanting to argue that your little god throws them everywhere and only allows them to link up into genetic codes here in 'Murrica, fuck yeah.

Seriously: go buy an education. It's absolutely worth the money.

Apparently, you need the education. I asked where did amino acids come from, and you are telling me where they are found. Reading comprehension, people.

If you're the best he can do, your god is scraping bottom of barrel. Seriously, your "arguments" were seen on AOL 16 years ago; your "arguments" have been dismissed for decades before that; and you don't even have the philosophical basis for your belief; you're clearly engaged in ex post facto rationalization.

I am the best at what I do..and I prove it by doing it.

If you limit yourself to "apologetics", you're necessarily limiting yourself. Engage in free thought, subject your beliefs to limitless scrutiny, and be as unforgiving of your own preconceptions as you are of those who disagree with you.
If you can.

In the words of St. Peter, when some of the disciples deserted Jesus and Jesus asked Peter was he leaving too, and Peter said "Where else will I go, you have the words of eternal life" (John 6:60-71)

Well, where else do I need to go when I am following the man that has given me the free gift of eternal life?

---

Reality/the universe/the multiverse could give a rat's ass about our analogies, our philosophies, or thought experiments, etc.....

Analogies point out logical absurdities, and if you believe in logical absurdities, then you are lost.

Sure, an infinite regress does pose certain 'logical' problems, and is hard to figure out. But if we find there is an infinite regress, guess what? That's our problem to figure out. Reality isn't going to go "Oh I'm sorry, this doesn't make sense to you? Here, let me change that..."

Thanks for admitting that it is a problem

It's "illogical" to some people still that time doesn't not travel at a consistent speed. The fact that they find it "illogical" has zero bearing on the fact that it happens.

If it happens, then it can't be too damn illogical, now can it?