Proof A=A

[Violet]

Crossing out half of someone else's response usually tends to have that effect.

Not when the half crossed out is grammatically irrelevant to your question.

Example: Was the blue candy you ate the other day delicious?
Was the blue candy you ate the other day delicious?
Was the candy delicious?

^ Was exactly what i did. If you didn't mean to ask the following, then perhaps you should rephrase it?

how do you know logic cannot refute logically impossible concepts such as god?

(I could have also crossed out the 'such as god', as it is utterly irrelevant to the question of "How do you know logic cannot refute logically impossible concepts?"... but I felt it could be easily enough understood.)

My question, now that you understand where it is coming from... is why did you even ask that question? If logic cannot refute logically impossible concepts (Read: concepts logic has already refuted)... then the concepts weren't logically impossible to begin with. If logic can (which if you are already considering logically impossible concepts it must be true that it does)... then your entire question was rhetorical and pointless.

Hence I asked:

You asked a question that contradicts itself... and you expect an answer to it?

As far as the rest of your sentence was concerned (those being:

I am bored and tired so I'll ask you one last time,

^Unnecessary, and

insupportable by evidence, (not logically unknowable or improbable)

^Unrelated to what logic can refute, thus irrelevant to the question.)

It was completely unnecessary and if you were trying to make a further point with those words, please do rephrase them into something that we can actually answer.