RE: A Former Atheist
May 4, 2015 at 12:44 am
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2015 at 12:49 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(May 3, 2015 at 10:52 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:(May 3, 2015 at 10:28 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Indeed. Be advised, clarity is a double-edged sword. I don't think it will be doing you any favors here.
On the contrary, it does do one a favor by telling one exactly how seriously to take someone's posts. In this case, Alex K learned not to take anything from that person seriously. It is useful for the rest of us in precisely the same way.
You quoted me before I edited my post reflecting the poster. I had thought it was the banned OP posting what I quoted at first.
I blame a ten-hour work day dealing with a capacity crowd at the Preserve.
The cutting edge of clarity lacerates bullshit artists. I think we all agree that Alex K is not near that category.
(May 3, 2015 at 11:01 pm)Theoretical Skeptic Wrote:(May 3, 2015 at 10:52 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: On the contrary, it does do one a favor by telling one exactly how seriously to take someone's posts. In this case, Alex K learned not to take anything from that person seriously. It is useful for the rest of us in precisely the same way.
How fortunate for the uninformed skeptic who hasn't an argument, eh?
Yo, I know you're banned -- the mods might let you talk again soon, chill, homey -- but you haven't rebutted one point I've made, so your point here is also double-edged, dumbfuck.
If you're allowed back, I might treat you more seriously if you take the time to answer the points I've made, instead of pursuing personal attacks at the expense of thoughtful posting.
Then again, I may simply give you a dose of your own medicine, and limit myself to making uncharitable assumptions about your parental teaching, assuming you're old enough to sire a child.