(June 18, 2015 at 12:56 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(June 18, 2015 at 3:25 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: Do you approve of raping 13-year-old boys? Do you think it's more moral than raping 10-year-old boys?
Sorry that my hair-splitter is in the shop for sharpening. You'll need to distinguish the moral differences of the two acts, and you'll need to explain why you regard that difference as meaningful.
This entire "it wasn't pedophilia, raping adolescents is called hebephilia" entirely dodges the point that priests fucking young boys is a betrayal of the morality those priests are charged with exemplifying.
You're retreating to semantics because you know you've already lost the moral battle. Don't think you're fooling anyone here ... but in case you do think that, I will make sure to disabuse you of that notion.
Oh the Irony.
You hypocrites came out of the woodwork to defend a homosexual (Harvey Milk) having sex with an underage teen, I wonder why you guys can't seem to get behind the homosexuals in the Catholic church.....[
Hey, dumbfuck, I didn't post in that thread. You have any link at all to me under this name or my usual "Thumpalumpacus" where I defend the rape of teenagers?
No, you don't. Because I've never done that. I haven't defended Milk's actions. You don't realize how stupid you look here, so I'm trying to help you out here: you should restrict yourself actual facts. Dumbfuck.
