RE: What Human Rights?
August 28, 2015 at 1:10 pm
(This post was last modified: August 28, 2015 at 1:12 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(August 28, 2015 at 12:53 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: I called it an appeal to emotion because you posted a later developed fetus to demonstrate how human like fetuses are, despite the fact that the vast majority of abortions are done well before that. I understand your reasons for being against abortion, that's not what I was calling into question, I just thought it was dishonest to use that image to demonstrate how "human" fetuses look.
What was dishonest about the image of a real 'fetus' that was actually extracted from its mother's womb using a procedure defended by Barry Obama and Hillary Clinton. Damn right its emotional, because it's a contemporary holocaust and if you had any humanity you too would be appalled by what the butchers at Planned Parenthood do every day and apologists like NARAL that support and encourage exactly what you see in the photo.
Don't be stupid. You're trying to excuse yourself by implying that no no you would never support what the photo shows just the termination of 'blobs of tissue'. Guess what. You yourself are a blob of tissue. Euphemisms make it easy to justify evil. Look at the earlier posts that claim human rights are social construct, etc. etc. They do not really believe in the things theists do like the essential dignity and sanctity of human life. If they did they wouldn't be so quick to define human rights away or rather define them to please whatever political agenda they support.
