RE: Seeing red
January 17, 2016 at 6:14 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2016 at 6:14 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Daniel Dennett on "real consciousness":
Source, transcript from: https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_dennett_on...anguage=en
Daniel Dennett Wrote:[...]This is a lovely book by a friend of mine named Lee Siegel, who's a professor of religion, actually, at the University of Hawaii, and he's an expert magician, and an expert on the street magic of India, which is what this book is about, "Net of Magic." And there's a passage in it which I would love to share with you. It speaks so eloquently to the problem. "'I'm writing a book on magic,' I explain, and I'm asked, 'Real magic?' By 'real magic,' people mean miracles, thaumaturgical acts, and supernatural powers. 'No,' I answer. 'Conjuring tricks, not real magic.' 'Real magic,' in other words, refers to the magic that is not real; while the magic that is real, that can actually be done, is not real magic."
Now, that's the way a lot of people feel about consciousness.
Real consciousness is not a bag of tricks. If you're going to explain this as a bag of tricks, then it's not real consciousness, whatever it is. And, as Marvin said, and as other people have said, "Consciousness is a bag of tricks." This means that a lot of people are just left completely dissatisfied and incredulous when I attempt to explain consciousness. So this is the problem. [...]
Source, transcript from: https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_dennett_on...anguage=en