(January 20, 2016 at 10:36 am)pool the great Wrote:I'm on the same side as you and even I think your arguments are ridiculous.(January 20, 2016 at 9:53 am)Mathilda Wrote: So what exactly would be evidence? Whatever is presented to you, you say it is not evidence. You've not only moved the goal posts, you've now removed them from the field completely. Just like a theist when presented with evidence of evolution.
You do realise that as with all scientific studies, there's never a single bit of evidence that proves something either true or false don't you? You are guilty of Binary religious thinking
This is why we collect a body of evidence and create theories which are testable. This was just one piece of evidence. There are plenty of other studies:
https://www.hastac.org/blogs/superadmin/...Dh.twitter
http://www.thelocal.de/jobs/article/wome...s-than-men
How exactly are they comparable? Just saying they are comparable without describing why is pointless and can be ignored.
You have theories. Conspiracy theories.
You don't have evidence.
Say you conducted a study, you select a random 10,000 people and you ask them if they have had an experience with God, say the majority of them reply with "Yes, I've had an experience with God.". Will this prove the existence of God?
No.
Because they are not evidence.
If you want people to believe such a strong claim you are making you'd want very strong evidence, opinions are easily dismissible, so better luck next time.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.