"Men's rights activists are pig misogynists,men don't have issues!"

[Losty]

Actually where they came from is purely speculation. A bit of biology, a bit of religion, a bit of this, a bit of that. It's not nearly so cut and dry as you try to put it. What about matriarchal societies? If it were completely biological, you'd have to argue that those societies are not biologically the same as other humans.

I want source that backs up your claim before I proceed to examine the rest of your post.

Just as your source is actually about mating and doesn't specifically relate to the topic, there aren't many options when it comes to peer reviewed articles relating to societal standards.

This is an interesting read
http://www.quebecoislibre.org/younkins26.html

Also, this would be nice if I could find the whole article
http://www.peerreviewedbymyneurons.com/2...ial-norms/

There is no science that backs up the belief that social norms are strictly the result of biology. There is also no science that backs up the idea that mating is the only or even the most important reason people adhere to social norms. Finally, there is no science that backs up the idea that biology is the only factor for humans which choosing a mate.