Monogamous or not.

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: May 10, 2024, 1:42 am

Poll: Monogamous or not This poll is closed.
monogamous	76.92%	30	76.92%
not monogamous	15.38%	6	15.38%
some other description	7.69%	3	7.69%
Total		39 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Monogamous or not.

Whateverist

Away

Donators

Known religious sympathizer/accomodationist

Religious Views: Be civil or die!

Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation: 151

#109

RE: Monogamous or not.

June 27, 2016 at 6:05 pm

(June 27, 2016 at 9:10 am)chimp3 Wrote:
(June 27, 2016 at 9:05 am)Whateverist the White Wrote: Those are both great descriptors. Why choose? So long as you avoid threesomes I think you can still claim the mono- title.

I would not say I avoided threesomes. Just did not have the diplomatic skills to make those alliances. Does that still count?

Even if you were monogamous only by default I'm pretty sure you still are entitled to whatever virtue may accrue on that account. Congratulations.

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:14 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 5, 2016 at 10:21 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:23 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:27 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Ravenshire - June 5, 2016 at 10:53 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:26 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 7:28 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:38 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:52 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:59 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:39 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:41 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 7:37 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:50 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 3:53 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Heatheness - June 5, 2016 at 10:43 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 5, 2016 at 10:55 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 5, 2016 at 10:56 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:01 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:02 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:06 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:07 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 6, 2016 at 11:19 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by madog - June 5, 2016 at 11:11 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 6, 2016 at 12:11 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 12:39 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 6, 2016 at 4:00 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:02 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 6:37 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 6, 2016 at 4:13 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 4:26 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 6:10 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 8:08 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 8:31 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 6:54 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 7:32 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 7:35 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:55 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 9, 2016 at 8:13 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:09 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:11 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:14 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:15 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:19 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:22 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:27 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:28 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 9:07 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:13 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:06 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:07 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 11:56 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:09 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 7:36 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:01 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by account_inactive - June 6, 2016 at 6:24 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 6, 2016 at 7:39 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:44 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 4:20 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Gemini - June 6, 2016 at 8:46 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Athene - June 6, 2016 at 9:39 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by KevinM1 - June 7, 2016 at 1:58 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 7, 2016 at 3:41 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 7, 2016 at 3:56 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 6:43 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 7, 2016 at 10:12 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:50 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - June 7, 2016 at 7:03 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 7, 2016 at 8:08 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:32 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by lisah - June 11, 2016 at 8:11 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:35 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Valkyrie - June 7, 2016 at 8:37 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 7, 2016 at 10:10 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 8, 2016 at 5:57 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 8, 2016 at 2:48 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 3:50 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 8, 2016 at 4:13 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 6:39 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 8, 2016 at 3:05 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by YahwehIsTheWay - June 9, 2016 at 10:02 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Cecelia - June 10, 2016 at 6:36 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 10, 2016 at 6:39 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:52 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Expired - June 27, 2016 at 7:56 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:59 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:07 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:31 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:34 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:53 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:01 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 9:05 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:10 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 6:05 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:09 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:19 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:28 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:12 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by mlmooney89 - June 27, 2016 at 12:37 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:39 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:17 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Grand Nudger - June 27, 2016 at 3:25 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 16, 2016 at 7:10 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrokenQuill92 - July 16, 2016 at 8:27 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 9:16 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by rexbeccarox - July 16, 2016 at 9:55 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 10:12 pm

RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 1:22 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 17, 2016 at 2:21 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 3:18 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 17, 2016 at 4:08 am

RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 4:10 am

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)