Heated debate on evolution with brother

[Amarok]

Just to be clear, I'm not arguing against naturally occurring evolution, I only think the lay-proponents of the Neo-Darwin synthesis are dogmatically opposed to recent rival naturalistic theories because they are scared of a theistic boogeyman.

If  by dogmatic you mean being strongly  opposed to unscientific derp posing as science .That has been debunked six ways from Sunday and is generally founded on  dishonesty  or ignorance about the current state of our knowledge . And  often demonstrably comes often with broader agenda attached to it . then yes I'm dogmatic but it has nothing to do with naturalism or theism. And considering your own demonstrated ignorance using the laughable spectre of Icons of Evolutions this point could be enforced better.