"Cultural Appropriation"

[Crunchy]

Khemikal Wrote:
You called it a newly minted term to excuse your ignorance.  I informed you that this was not the case.  Are you now bitching that, unless it's written on a cave wall........you;re still right?  Honestly, what's the terminus of this argument....to demonstrate that you are unaware of the meaning of a term?  Because that's how this ends.

Each word is old, but the concept as a negative is a new idea. That's why it's become such a flash point of discussion as of late. 

You have the internet.  Let wonder lead you to knowledge.  You can't have googled it, for example...and still maintain your many hilarious positions on the issue. 

As do you. Google it yourself and you will see many different opinions on this subject. You're arrogant condescension carries no weight and never has.

I didn't create the difference, numbskull..the people who engaged in cultural appropriation did.

Since the entire point of this thread is the meaning of the term... then yes, you did create the difference and you did it using your racist ideology.

I foind it ironic that a person who is currently insisting that there either -was- no appropriuation, or that it;s no different from exchange, feels that they can defend themselves and their position by calling some else a racist......talk about tone deaf.

So once again you frame disagreement with yourself as an example of racism. Can you be an atheist if you think you're god?
I've given examples and describe why I see no difference. You've vomited out an opinion with nothing to back it up other than an arrogant belief that everyone is a bigot except you. And I find this amusing as you are one of the most bigoted people who post at this site.