You're too busy moving the goalposts to ever accept that you were given an example. Again, and for the last fucking time, I never said the left was fascist. I said there are fascists on the left as well as the right. Even one measly instance of that would be enough to back up my statement. For some reason, you seem to think I need to prove the statehouse is full of Dem fascists, which isn't what I fucking said.
Yes, Khem, this is your circus. From the first page, it was agreed that cultural appropriation meant the using of objects, ideas, etc. from other cultures. You know, the professional (read: not psycho SJW) definition of the term. Everyone was happy to argue whether that was okay. Then you burst in like Kool-Aid man insisting that everyone who thinks cultural appropriation is okay thinks raping and pillaging is okay. If they deny that is cultural appropriation, then they are denying that said raping and pillaging ever happened. If it won't be enough for you to realize that people are using a different fucking definition, one I would argue has a lot more validity than yours (that's beside the point), then no one will ever get anywhere with you in this thread. You make it futile on purpose. People can either say what you want them to say or they will forever be the idiots, even though you know damn well they are using a widely accepted definition for the term, not your alternative version. You've agreed that wearing, cooking, enjoying things from other cultures is fine. Well, cultural appropriation by our terms is fine. Everyone else has agreed that crimes against humanity are bad, so your definition is bad. End thread.
I'm ashamed of myself for engaging you again. I'm going to go take a shower.
Yes, Khem, this is your circus. From the first page, it was agreed that cultural appropriation meant the using of objects, ideas, etc. from other cultures. You know, the professional (read: not psycho SJW) definition of the term. Everyone was happy to argue whether that was okay. Then you burst in like Kool-Aid man insisting that everyone who thinks cultural appropriation is okay thinks raping and pillaging is okay. If they deny that is cultural appropriation, then they are denying that said raping and pillaging ever happened. If it won't be enough for you to realize that people are using a different fucking definition, one I would argue has a lot more validity than yours (that's beside the point), then no one will ever get anywhere with you in this thread. You make it futile on purpose. People can either say what you want them to say or they will forever be the idiots, even though you know damn well they are using a widely accepted definition for the term, not your alternative version. You've agreed that wearing, cooking, enjoying things from other cultures is fine. Well, cultural appropriation by our terms is fine. Everyone else has agreed that crimes against humanity are bad, so your definition is bad. End thread.
I'm ashamed of myself for engaging you again. I'm going to go take a shower.
