Okay, Mr.Obvious, you are of the Pauca sapienti school of writing. In which case, you can do that school even better, no need to join internet forums to write out your thoughts, just look up people and talk with each other with your eyes only, and make grunts instead of speaking words.
I like to invite you and me to exchange thoughts on what is existence, is that all right with you?
You want to tell me that for you Existance is, that is enough for you to know what is existence.
Well, it is one thing for you to think that you know what is something, but it is another thing to know how to tell others what you know of something, in words.
Pray tell me, how else can you tell people who use language, i.e. words, what you know of the something by which you have a word for and they have the same word for, but you care to put what you both know, with words other than the word itself, like in the present context, what is existence.
You care to put into words what you both know of the something, in the present context, existence, so that you both, or you and I we both concur exactly in concise, clear, simple language i.e. words, but not including that word of present concern, existence, what is existence
We will do it this way, here below; unless you want us to do it in another better way, then I will cooperate with you totally.
Here, I will ask you this question:
How did you come to know of existence?
I like to invite you and me to exchange thoughts on what is existence, is that all right with you?
You want to tell me that for you Existance is, that is enough for you to know what is existence.
Well, it is one thing for you to think that you know what is something, but it is another thing to know how to tell others what you know of something, in words.
Pray tell me, how else can you tell people who use language, i.e. words, what you know of the something by which you have a word for and they have the same word for, but you care to put what you both know, with words other than the word itself, like in the present context, what is existence.
You care to put into words what you both know of the something, in the present context, existence, so that you both, or you and I we both concur exactly in concise, clear, simple language i.e. words, but not including that word of present concern, existence, what is existence
We will do it this way, here below; unless you want us to do it in another better way, then I will cooperate with you totally.
Here, I will ask you this question:
How did you come to know of existence?
Mr.Obvious Wrote:# #66 RE: What do scientists say about existence?
What a bullshit question anyways?
What is existance?
If that's as vague a term as you are going to use:
Existance is.
That is all.
-------------------
#80 RE: What do scientists say about existence?
[...]
Adressing Mariosep:
Thin veils of expensive words lugged together in an awfull, unchopped monstrosity of a sentence is not a display of intelligence.
Neither is a void question anymore than a vain and pathetic attempt at seeming deep.
Existence is. I dare you to find me a better way of putting it. Honestly. It's not using the word to explain itself. It's simply stopping where no more words are needed. Where the growing pile would be detrimental. Less is more. Brevity is key. A lesson you'd do well to learn.
Hint: The world is a much simpler place than you may make it out to be. And perhaps more absurd than any of us realize.
Your post was adressed above, for the convencience of readers. Because it's simpler. I'm a simple guy. And not a pathetic showboat desperate to get a rise out of people by being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian.
