Good day, dear atheist colleagues here, now I invite your retired staff member here, one Khemikal, for us two to exchange thoughts on what is sensory apparatus, for he is the one who brings up that term.
Dear Khemikal, let us we two talk about what is sensory apparatus by which you come to know what is existence.
You have brought up that term, sensory apparatus, so in re knowledge of existence, what do you mean by that term?
You bring up the term, so you have the right the privilege and the burden to explain what is your meaning of the term sensory apparatus.
Okay, dear readers, let us all sit back and await with bated breath to read how Khemikal explains the term he introduced into this thread, namely, sensory apparatus.
But I fear he will do a Mr.Obvious, go into non-communication mode.
And please Khemikal, do your own thinking and writing and no bringing in blind links, or quotes from the net, if you get everything from other sources instead of your own thinking and writing, then don't bother to mention them except informing readers here that according to what you read, now at this point in your very own words, reproduce what you read as already appropriated by you to be the truth, the fact, and the logic, and also founded on the best thoughts of mankind from since the dawn of man's conscious intelligence.
What I expect from atheists is that they think even just from what they read from others; but if from others, it is enough to just mention it, this way, according to what I read, no need to bring in names, and links, and quotes whatever, very important: reproduce what you read as appropriated by you, and write it in your own words by your very own writing style.
Now, if you after this you want me to explain something I write here, you can ask me also.
Okay, dear readers here, let us all as I said earlier sit back, and await with bated breath to witness how Khemikal explains what is sensory apparatus.
And I want to tell you all, that the way to detect whether someone knows what he is talking about with a term he brings up, require him to explain the term in not more than say 50 words, when he cannot do it at all, then it is conspicuous that he does not really know what he is talking about.
So, dear readers, when you read posts coming after this post of yours truly, and in the first 50 words the author does not explain, any poster, what is sensory perception, then you need not read further, no sense in joining him in further evasiveness.
Dear Khemikal, let us we two talk about what is sensory apparatus by which you come to know what is existence.
You have brought up that term, sensory apparatus, so in re knowledge of existence, what do you mean by that term?
You bring up the term, so you have the right the privilege and the burden to explain what is your meaning of the term sensory apparatus.
Okay, dear readers, let us all sit back and await with bated breath to read how Khemikal explains the term he introduced into this thread, namely, sensory apparatus.
But I fear he will do a Mr.Obvious, go into non-communication mode.
And please Khemikal, do your own thinking and writing and no bringing in blind links, or quotes from the net, if you get everything from other sources instead of your own thinking and writing, then don't bother to mention them except informing readers here that according to what you read, now at this point in your very own words, reproduce what you read as already appropriated by you to be the truth, the fact, and the logic, and also founded on the best thoughts of mankind from since the dawn of man's conscious intelligence.
What I expect from atheists is that they think even just from what they read from others; but if from others, it is enough to just mention it, this way, according to what I read, no need to bring in names, and links, and quotes whatever, very important: reproduce what you read as appropriated by you, and write it in your own words by your very own writing style.
Now, if you after this you want me to explain something I write here, you can ask me also.
Okay, dear readers here, let us all as I said earlier sit back, and await with bated breath to witness how Khemikal explains what is sensory apparatus.
And I want to tell you all, that the way to detect whether someone knows what he is talking about with a term he brings up, require him to explain the term in not more than say 50 words, when he cannot do it at all, then it is conspicuous that he does not really know what he is talking about.
So, dear readers, when you read posts coming after this post of yours truly, and in the first 50 words the author does not explain, any poster, what is sensory perception, then you need not read further, no sense in joining him in further evasiveness.
Quote:Khemikal
Retired Staff
Posts: 32101
Threads: 102
Joined: 28th June 2011
Reputation: 131
#86 RE: What do scientists say about existence?
17th June 2017, 03:10
--------------------------------
We come to know existence through our sensory apparatus.
_________________________
“I can’t even go to a goddamn potluck without having to thank some space fairy for the broccoli casserole!” -Trae Crowder
-----------------------
2 kudos given by: Mister Agenda, Astreja
