(July 19, 2017 at 1:22 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote:Okay, I see what you mean, the way I stated was incomplete. Actually My #8 was meant to convey domesticated animals that can serve mankind more directly then wild animals. Sorry for the confusion.(July 18, 2017 at 6:23 pm)snowtracks Wrote: Well then, you agree with my posted sequence.
6. Produced swarms of small sea animals.
7. Created birds and sea mammals.
8. Created land mammals capable of interacting with the future human race which included bi-pedal mammals as Neanderthals (non-spirit hominid - as is all mammals; and consequently have no existence after bodily death).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that there is no evidence to corroborate your interpretation of genesis and the fact that the sequences are out of order, probably don't bother you?
For instance, mammals first evolved on land. Aquatic mammals didn't come first.
The water cycle was probably established quite early on based on isotopic evidence from the Jack Hills zircons
There were no continental landmasses on the early earth. The world was basically one big "ocean basin" early on. You didn't get continents for billions of years
Cheers
TheBeardedDude
No, your sequence is erroneous and factually incorrect. Sea mammals descended from land mammals. Therefore mammals of the sea CAN'T come before land mammals.
Atheist Credo: An universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.