RE: Hello
June 28, 2017 at 12:01 am
(This post was last modified: June 28, 2017 at 12:22 am by DogmaticDownSouth.)
@ ignoramus
I have asked for and recieved permission from the other participant and they actually want it reviewed as well by some one independent.
As I stated earlier, I would redact all idenifying information such as email address, names (except for public figures, in particular Matt Dillahunty who is well known and this was a email to the Atheist-Experience, though Matt didn't participate.
The whole thing started when I called into the show asking the same question I asked the group -> I have this moral arguement that leads to this conclusion. I am hard pressed to find a flaw, but would like you to let me know if and where I could be wrong. Again if I am then I learned something and learning is always good,
Matt's response was unless I wanted to change laws on abortions, he didn;t care, which is odd to me because they talk about moral issues and all kinds of things that are not about changing laws all the time. So I posted a comment to the chat room to that effect and was asked to send my email to them. I did so and honestly as I stated the discussion I received was disappointing. To be clear, I called 30 minutes before the show and he took my call prior to the live show and hung up on me prior to the show, was I was never on air. Honestly, as near as I can tell he didn't run it by his co-host either so he kind of made the Matt D show instead of the Atheist Experience. Beyond that, as I told him, his co-host was female and I was interested in hearing her opinoin.
That's how I got here.
Sorry, long story that you probably didn't need to hear, but wanted to explain where this came from and I was't surreptitiously posting something without permission. You would see in the email thread they explicitly give permission, ask to be notified when and where it will be posted, and feel confident they will be exhonerated.
I personally have re-read the thread a few times and still cannot get over points of intellectual dishonesty that I personally thought were there, but again independent verification is the corner stone to determining reality from delusion so would love to know if I need more meds
Truth be told, I get very frustrated at her for what I perceive as intellectual dishonesty and acting on bad faith. After she starts calling names, I lose all respect for her and the last few emails are pretty insulting. I should probably have been more mature, but I stand behind the content of each and can laugh about a lot of the burns I give her so I'm not really ashamed of them but objectively I was getting pretty rude near the end, but besides questioning her intellect and interity and dropping f-bombs i don't think its so bad, and again given the responses she was giving me I thought (and still think) that her intellect and/or integrity are insulting so I stand behind the content, may the context could be more PC.
Again being honest and know I can and reasonably should be critized for this.
I have asked for and recieved permission from the other participant and they actually want it reviewed as well by some one independent.
As I stated earlier, I would redact all idenifying information such as email address, names (except for public figures, in particular Matt Dillahunty who is well known and this was a email to the Atheist-Experience, though Matt didn't participate.
The whole thing started when I called into the show asking the same question I asked the group -> I have this moral arguement that leads to this conclusion. I am hard pressed to find a flaw, but would like you to let me know if and where I could be wrong. Again if I am then I learned something and learning is always good,
Matt's response was unless I wanted to change laws on abortions, he didn;t care, which is odd to me because they talk about moral issues and all kinds of things that are not about changing laws all the time. So I posted a comment to the chat room to that effect and was asked to send my email to them. I did so and honestly as I stated the discussion I received was disappointing. To be clear, I called 30 minutes before the show and he took my call prior to the live show and hung up on me prior to the show, was I was never on air. Honestly, as near as I can tell he didn't run it by his co-host either so he kind of made the Matt D show instead of the Atheist Experience. Beyond that, as I told him, his co-host was female and I was interested in hearing her opinoin.
That's how I got here.
Sorry, long story that you probably didn't need to hear, but wanted to explain where this came from and I was't surreptitiously posting something without permission. You would see in the email thread they explicitly give permission, ask to be notified when and where it will be posted, and feel confident they will be exhonerated.
I personally have re-read the thread a few times and still cannot get over points of intellectual dishonesty that I personally thought were there, but again independent verification is the corner stone to determining reality from delusion so would love to know if I need more meds
(June 28, 2017 at 12:01 am)DogmaticDownSouth Wrote: @ ignoramus
I have asked for and recieved permission from the other participant and they actually want it reviewed as well by some one independent.
As I stated earlier, I would redact all idenifying information such as email address, names (except for public figures, in particular Matt Dillahunty who is well known and this was a email to the Atheist-Experience, though Matt didn't participate.
The whole thing started when I called into the show asking the same question I asked the group -> I have this moral arguement that leads to this conclusion. I am hard pressed to find a flaw, but would like you to let me know if and where I could be wrong. Again if I am then I learned something and learning is always good,
Matt's response was unless I wanted to change laws on abortions, he didn;t care, which is odd to me because they talk about moral issues and all kinds of things that are not about changing laws all the time. So I posted a comment to the chat room to that effect and was asked to send my email to them. I did so and honestly as I stated the discussion I received was disappointing. To be clear, I called 30 minutes before the show and he took my call prior to the live show and hung up on me prior to the show, was I was never on air. Honestly, as near as I can tell he didn't run it by his co-host either so he kind of made the Matt D show instead of the Atheist Experience. Beyond that, as I told him, his co-host was female and I was interested in hearing her opinoin.
That's how I got here.
Sorry, long story that you probably didn't need to hear, but wanted to explain where this came from and I was't surreptitiously posting something without permission. You would see in the email thread they explicitly give permission, ask to be notified when and where it will be posted, and feel confident they will be exhonerated.
I personally have re-read the thread a few times and still cannot get over points of intellectual dishonesty that I personally thought were there, but again independent verification is the corner stone to determining reality from delusion so would love to know if I need more meds
Truth be told, I get very frustrated at her for what I perceive as intellectual dishonesty and acting on bad faith. After she starts calling names, I lose all respect for her and the last few emails are pretty insulting. I should probably have been more mature, but I stand behind the content of each and can laugh about a lot of the burns I give her so I'm not really ashamed of them but objectively I was getting pretty rude near the end, but besides questioning her intellect and interity and dropping f-bombs i don't think its so bad, and again given the responses she was giving me I thought (and still think) that her intellect and/or integrity are insulting so I stand behind the content, may the context could be more PC.
Again being honest and know I can and reasonably should be critized for this.
