Plagiarism in the NT

[RoadRunner79]

I think the problem such as your post here, is that you don't understand context.  As I told you before, I'll post or comment on what I like when I like.  I don't think that I should be expected to jump off topic, and dance for you, just because I'm a Christian.  Or is that what my problem is, that merits such insult?  I think the problem is in your assumptions of me, and the mental dissonance, when I don't follow your expectations.

Unless you violate the TOS and the admins catch you, sure of course you can post what you like when you like, but don't confuse that as constituting evidence. And again, we've seen this before countless times from many people prior to you over the years.

Theist in one thread, " I am not here to"

Same theist in another thread, "My book says".

I am not asking you to follow my expectations. But if you want to prove to me what you claim, you DO have to meet the expectations of what universal scientific method demands. Don't accuse me of being the inventor of scientific method. I simply see it as currently humanity's best tool to gain factual knowledge on the nature of reality.

Yes, as I mentioned, you seem to have a difficulty with context.  Normally when I am replying I am discussing what is immediately being talked about.   Irregardless of whatever you imagine my motives are.  And no, I don't think that other discussions, count as me giving evidence.  I'm more interested in the good or bad reasoning behind the acceptance or rejection of what most reasonable people think is evidence.
I believe, that I have rarely; if ever stated here  "my book says", unless the context of the discussion is about the Bible.