(August 1, 2017 at 9:22 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(August 1, 2017 at 7:28 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:I'm telling you that the only evidence available to be pointed to in the source you linked...does not support or argue for the case made in the source you linked. My evidence, dipshit, is your own damned link. The author buried this deceit in a mountain of mythical irrelevancy..but, I guess..that's one way to con a mark, huh?
And you know what comes next... what's your evidence for that? Are you saying that one after this "internecine struggle" was ever removed from a crucifixion and buried? By the way, that can refer to a few events.
If you need evidence outside of your link..look no further than this thread. We don;t find much in the way of remains of those that had been crucified - even when it would be expected. What we do find are credulous imbeciles who, 2k years after this supposed fact, are willing to believe absolutely anything that they think conforms to their fairy tales, and no shortage of people willing to spin elaborate lies to provide the product they desperately want.
Fuck this dipshit, Khem, he's not even willing to meet us halfway, so there's clearly no point.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
