A good argument for God's existence (long but worth it)

[Brian37]

---

No, rather it's simple. You don't get to define what it means to be all-good while denying that there is any connection to the all-good because there is no all good, you make an imaginary sky which is the highest ultimate good, and you then define how it would be, create the world, and what it will, and say you see we proven such a being cannot exist, by a connection we don't have with him but just have made up.

If Highest Goodness exists, it is not going to be known simply by our whims nor blind shots in the dark, but must be recognized through a connection to it.

The above line includes the following statement: "If it not recognized through a connection to it, Highest Goodness would not be known".

If you have no idea what it is because you are arguing there is no connection, how can you put terms on it?

Or is that they are making use of his connection to the highest goodness while disbelieving in it and disproving it?

Come on dude. That is only a small part, it's not the main dish. The main dish is the proof I offered to how we can know God exists (among many other ways).

---

---

There is no need, because Quran does the best job, at proving and reminding of his existence.  However, the Quran needs receptive ears, reflection and true armies of intelligence to go with it.

If God exists, we certainly don't need people like me to prove it's existence.

---

I am just trying to help you guys that despite him emanating guidance from himself, reciting clear arguments for his existence and his religion, and despite appointing interpreters and leaders who guide by his command,  don't see the truth.

Indeed it maybe no matter how much I try, as long as you intend to be averse to God, then God will not allow the truth to enter your heart or receive no matter how clear the argument is, because you don't want to perceive.

Moses, Noah, other Prophets, they were all accused of being unclear, speaking nonsense, that no one understood what they say, but the Quran shows that was not true, people became rather blinded by their sheer opposition to the truth and believed in their own slogans despite them not making sense, and constantly demanded for clearer proofs, instead of looking at the clear proofs presented be they physical miracles they call sorcery or the divine books which stand towering above that of the speech of humans.

---

There is no book on this earth that comes even remotely close to proving the existence of god.  Isn't it funny that all "revelation of god" - no matter which god - has emerged from the imagination of a human being?  That's all "holy" books are.  Fantasies.  But you're right - if a god exists, he doesn't need people like you - or any human being, or any book, to prove it exists.  It's amazing that you would waste so much time typing up such wall-of-text convoluted argument nonsense when you admit yourself that your god doesn't need you to make the effort.

To be fair to him, like you said, "no matter which god". Jews and Christians also claim the same god of Abraham and claim that he is "all powerful" so yea, our argument wouldn't be just to him, but all three religions.

I just don't see the logic in claiming "all powerful" only for that claimed deity to want or need a marketing department or body guards. Why would an all powerful being need or want flawed humans to help it?

It would be like claiming the Terminator needs a midget to protect it. An all powerful god should not need or want human help.