(October 23, 2017 at 9:41 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(October 23, 2017 at 9:09 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: It is better because one seeks to know through proper true vision base on true judgment while the other just makes a judgment by desires.
That someone earnest tries see by way of true vision no matter what you base it on doesn't guarantee anything, and it certainly doesn't establish it as objective. This makes zero sense.
(October 23, 2017 at 9:09 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: And evil is following desires without guidance while good is following guidance and submitting oneself to it.
Just one more bald (unsupported) crazy claim.
(October 23, 2017 at 9:09 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: And what is life ..
I'm beginning to suspect you don't have a clue. You should give up on the ultimate and try instead to achieve even a modicum of adequacy. Baby steps.
LOL, thanks you provided me reflection on a proper argument for God.
1. It is better to sincerely try to objectively seek the vision of guidance rather than not.
2. If God doesn't exist, there is no reason to believe one can gain vision of guidance.
3. If there is no reason to believe one can gain vision of guidance, than it is not better to objectively seek the vision of guidance rather then not.
1, 3. If both these premises are true, we can conclude there are reason to believe one can vision of guidance. Call this premise (4).
4, 2 proves God exists if both premises are true.
And you implicit were stating this, but you didn't know it. I gathered this from your sentiment.
