" I'm nominally an atheist because every definition of God I've heard of consists of one or more of the following: 1) Incoherent 2) Untestable 3) Relabelling"
AND
"I have not seen any evidence or arguments for god that I find convincing. I find them to be flawed, fallacious,, and in the best of situations merely inconclusive. It's logical for me to withhold belief in a proposition until sufficient evidence has been adduced, so I am an atheist."
------------------------
( I will apologize, now for any errors in keeping track of y'all). I am asking my Q to (As), if you consider yourself one.
It seems you 2 folk believe you have some coherent, testable, non-relabeling, non-flawed, non-fallacious, logical. reason to answer the:
Q. Is there any logical. reasonable. rational reason to be an A?
Am I correct, that you both believe your view(s) to be rational, etc?
AND
"I have not seen any evidence or arguments for god that I find convincing. I find them to be flawed, fallacious,, and in the best of situations merely inconclusive. It's logical for me to withhold belief in a proposition until sufficient evidence has been adduced, so I am an atheist."
------------------------
( I will apologize, now for any errors in keeping track of y'all). I am asking my Q to (As), if you consider yourself one.
It seems you 2 folk believe you have some coherent, testable, non-relabeling, non-flawed, non-fallacious, logical. reason to answer the:
Q. Is there any logical. reasonable. rational reason to be an A?
Am I correct, that you both believe your view(s) to be rational, etc?