(May 28, 2018 at 12:43 am)Ybe Wrote:(May 27, 2018 at 6:55 pm)Kit Wrote: And you've officially given me access to your burden of proof despite your goddamn idiotic OP response.The problem here is you think I'm trying to prove G. I am not.
Prove to me first that your G has any power or that the G even exists.
But I am trying to get a rational logical reason for being an A.
I've decided y'all need some clarification. If you would like to participate great:
> Arguments should be relevant to what is being asked (see first post) and the relevance should be shown.
> Justify your statements (arguments, so far were assertions) . So justify them ask yourself, and then say why your assertion true?
> Validity should also be included, any logical reason should have premises that logically produce the conclusion as the only possible
conclusion.
Hope you are able to participate.
(May 28, 2018 at 12:09 am)Whateverist Wrote: So just like your own, in other words?
Possibly, but really I am only asking a Q uestion which I am sincere about, as I keep hoping for a good answer(s).
If I assert something, without support, you are welcome to consider if you think there is or isn't support or else take it as opinion.
people claim a god a god exists, I don't see any evidence that a god exists therefore I don't believe the claim. It the same logical position that you would take with any extraordinary claim at face value. If I asked you to provide a logical reason for not believing in leprechauns what would you say?