RE: Ontological Disproof of God
August 21, 2018 at 12:17 pm
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2018 at 1:34 am by Losty.)
(August 21, 2018 at 12:01 pm)negatio Wrote:(August 20, 2018 at 3:24 am)purplepurpose Wrote: Could you boil down your post to few main points(Edit it). Nobody will read this nightmare wall of text.Nonetheless, a firestorm of responses to my putatively unintelligible writing has erupted ! This is fun. I love the interaction. Some of it is so flippantly and fallaciously violent against my person, instead of against my position, that it is nauseating ! Some radically patient, intelligent, and properly intellectually instrumented person or persons will read it, and, hopefully, attempt to rationally destroy the stances I have taken against Deity and Law...My post is, to me, boiled-down, and, pursues just a few main points ! Thank you. Duane C.
Moderator Notice
Edited to fix quote tags
For truth yet it be told that if one perchance has the opportunity to evoke such strong responses by means of some machination that irritates the audience beyond redemption then needless to say it is not surprising in the slightest that they shall respond in kind and your original intention shall be all but forgotten. Dare I ask of you to enlighten me as to whether this was indeed your original intention, or it was some serendipitous finding that you came across and exploited for your own personal textual pleasure. I am not one to judge another person's delights, for one persons meat is another person's poison, especially if said is forced down one's throat inn a most unwelcome manner. But I digress! The fact that you find such fun in these interpersonal interactions suggest that your sole intention from the very outset was to evoke emption in your enraptured readers. Am I right in postulating this or was it all a happy accident? Because if it was indeed the former then one can lay the charge of you deliberately being, what is commonly referred to in the vernacular of the space of the Internet, of being similar to that mythical creature that lives underneath structures that allow transportation and perambulation over other structures, whether natural or artificial such as waterways or buildings. I do of course refer to the accusation, at the very least the suspicion that you are purported to be a troll. I for one, and I hope I do not offend you in this, consider this to be an entirely valid accusation of which there is much evidence already garnered in the 11 pages of digital text created so far, as displayed when viewed in a browser of HTML. You do in fact seem to have forgotten about your original post of musings of the philosophical kind, for I hesistate to call it philosophy whereby like the field of science, one has to be properly published and peer reviewed for it to be considered work fit of such a description. But I do not wish to insult another who is s fond of speech patterns common to classical English literature, for I used to be a reader of such works myself. But I do feel compelled to warn you that others may feel that there is now enough evidence to report you to the moderators of this virtual online interactove forum of being a troll.
Moderator Notice
You’re evil, Tildie
You’re evil, Tildie