RE: Ontological Disproof of God
August 26, 2018 at 3:25 am
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2018 at 3:49 am by negatio.)
Quote:an argument that, on strictly logical grounds, cannot be refuted, unicorns must existNo, not an argument based on logical grounds which cannot be refuted; rather, I must submit argument based on rational ontological grounds, that cannot be defeated, because the description which I must give of a Unicorn must first be an ontologically correct and intelligible description of a Unicorn...I must be able to present an inventory of the Unicorn's several ontological characteristics, and, since I cannot, the argument could not even get off the ground and would never even be the subject of critique...
(August 26, 2018 at 2:10 am)Losty Wrote:Losty, Holy Cow, this absolutely blows my mind, you corrected every stupid mistake I made when I did not know what I was doing...incredible...fantastic...my thread looks less like an insane person administers it ! Wow, I cannot possibly thank you enough...I have not been able to see if you fixed all that horrible duplicate stuff that was terrorizing me as well...Thank a Million. Wow. Negatio.(August 25, 2018 at 10:34 pm)negatio Wrote: Ha ! Dreamer ! Yes, publishing seems an ideal possibility, however, I am not even sure if people read printed works anymore. At this point, to act in pursuit of the possibility of publication would be a radically difficult objective for me to attain, I only have a B.A., which may not give me sufficient credence in the world of publication. Online is good for now. I wanted to cast my writing out into the world; now, I have, via the internet; and, a certain process has perhaps begun, i.e., that process wherein a person submits a theoretical work to the world, and, then, goes through a series of paradigm stages, which I do not clearly recall at the moment, wherein, at first, his theory is absolutely scorned and rejected as absurd and unworthy nonsense; then, it is seen to be radically acceptable the world; then, the persons who originally maintained the absurdity of the theory, claim it as their own !
It most certainly appears so. I'm a Californian. Radical dude !
My brain is spinning trying to figure out how to fix this one lol.