Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

KevinM!, you  have been on my case, big time, ever since I arrived here.  Look at the history of your posts; and, you swing back and forth between nice, and, being a little dick!  You address me in such a hostile, disrespectful, and condescending manner in your continuous harassing attempts to make me over into a being which you prefer for me, and, so is everyone else.  Did you see the great interaction between Vulcanlogician and Negatio, where I explained why I write the way I write; however, you constantly insist that my being me is entirely insufficient.  Your above criticism takes the same condescending tone, yea, sure, you are going to make me over into the image of you, and, then, all will be well.  To me as an older guy, you are coming-off, in the past, and now, in a very peevish and immature fashion, ordering me to straighten-up and fly it right! And, so are many others, who scream scream for simplicity...read the Vulcanlogician/Negatio interchange from yesterday because, the dialectical pressure which Vulcanlogician subjected me to, in gentlemanly fashion, excited me to giving him a solid answer regarding why I had to write the OP  in the way in which I did. Negatio.

RE: the bolded -

You're right.  That's because I'm of two minds regarding you:

1. On the off chance you're not simply trolling us, I'd honestly rather have a new member in the community than not.  So, part of me does want to help you.

2. That said, I'm about 99% certain that you're simply having a good laugh at our expense, because who simply:

• Dumps a poorly formatted treatise on a bunch of strangers without any kind of introduction?
  
• Uses a random online forum as a digital archive when there's so many better options (which have been laid out for you)?
  
• Becomes irrationally defensive and rude when people ask for clarification/better formatting/less superfluously flourished language?
  
• Takes 18.5 (roughly) pages to not even meet us half way with the above?
  

I mean, let's be clear here - you started your bullshit when pgrimes asked for some clarification.  You responded with:

You  have simply encountered a totally different perspectival world view, and, you have neither the education nor the reflection requisite to possibly follow the distinctive and different weltanschauung, which you just now  encounter !  I sincerely appreciate you deeming my writing as potentially significant; while, all the while, it is a radically beautiful and glib song which has, in fact, overthrown "law" within a purely theoretical sphere...

How is that not trolling?  And if it's not trolling, then why would you expect anyone to treat you politely when you lead off with this kind of display?

So, congratulations - you either did a fairly competent (if obvious) troll job on the rest of us, or you're a person that really needs to learn how to play well with others.

I absolutely and truly did not know what trolling was when I wrote my honest reply to pgrimes; he was being cool, I merely gave him the way I honestly
 have been conditioned to think during 46 years of fun on campus, and, that is essentially what I said in my interchange with Vulc yesterday, in a very rational and effective manner. Everything around here is trolling and, everyone is trolling me constantly, however, all I have to do is simply stand up to you against insult, and, thereby, I am for sure a troll; this troll mentality is so goddamn destructive.  If the very first thing I did was a horrid act, that was the very last think I thought it was.  I did not mean archiving in the sense you are taking it; I meant placing my paper among other persons, where it would essentially stay there for good. I had many other papers on many other forum type places, Abaddon dug out a far out one. Hell, I had my  desktop choke up and die just today.  These sites do serve me as caches, their sit does not  die.

Will further study your excellent response and get back to you later. Negatio.