(September 29, 2018 at 12:04 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:[b]RoadRunner79 Wrote:And you have the testimony from a number of others, that say they have no recollection of this party. The testimony from Kavenaugh and Judge, that this did not occur. And the testimony of her good friend, who was supposedly there (as well as a number of other parties with Ford), but denies having ever known Judge and Kavenaugh or remembering the party described. There is zero corroborating evidence. It seems that this is based on more emotion and I see people pointing to the ends, rather than the means. I'm starting to suspect that this is the case in a number of arguments here (hence the inconsistencies I see in many) It's less about reason and evidence, and more about emotion and the desired result.Never has a statement possessed so much distortion of facts utter projection and outright hypocrisy .
And irony. It's so thick in that comment you could cut it with a dull spoon.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
