(April 5, 2019 at 1:09 pm)Amarok Wrote:Quote:The difference - a bomb cannot be used defensively - thus by current legal definitions being in the category of destructive devices - and therefore not equatable to firearms in considering rights.Whole nations use atom bombs defensively and deterrents are defensive .Plus you see I "Feel " threatened by my neighbor and therefore should have the right to defensively deter him with it . After everyone knows the threat of mutual destruction works ......
M.A.D. wasn't defensive, it was the promise of destruction visited on those who destroyed us.
