(April 7, 2019 at 1:04 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(April 7, 2019 at 12:53 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: So, no movement on your phony facts regarding firearm homicides vs vehicular homicides, then?
Boru
Go look - as you won't accept what I say.
Show your work.
In acts if terrorism - in any single incident - what is the highest number killed by firearm - and by vehicle?
Answer - vehicles win - hands down.
The most killed in total? By bombs.
There are more INCIDENTS by gun - but the numbers killed are relatively low per incident.
Getting rid of the guns would prompt terrorists to use more effective means like fire, bombs and vehicles.
Does this mean do we need more guns you ask? Don' t be a cunt. No, it does not mean that. It means that getting rid of guns is a poor way to combat terrorism. It always has been.
But it is as it' s always been - a good first step at enslaving the masses.
In a single incident in Mumbai 166 people where killed by guns.
In the UK civilians aren't armed or enslaved.
Is it because your countries history of enslavement is so recent that you fear the return of the bad old days?
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
