How about this..

[Drich]

Yes yes i get what you are saying people are telling me it is not perpetual motion because I'm not breaking the second law... the problem you can not explain how. not once ever in one of your post have you been able to explain this. Why?

Because we're trying to avoid confusing you. Besides, it has been pointed out to you.

Why perpetual motion is impossible?
The reason why perpetual motion machines are impossible is because friction and other forces always manage to sap energy. You can make as close to a friction-free pendulum as possible, but it’s still a nearly zero-sum equation, with some minuscule amount of energy loss.

https://www.livescience.com/55944-perpet...hines.html

Basically the second law says that entropy will always increase over time. This means that a system cannot be perpetual because nothing lasts forever.

To use a simplistic analogy. Think of a ball on top of a hill. It can roll down to the bottom of the hill but can't roll back up it, at least not to the same height as before. Eventually the ball will settle into the most stable state it can where there is nowhere further to roll down, and by doing so global entropy will be increased.

The hill is a thermodynamic gradient.

Fuel is shorthand to describe a thermodynamic gradient that can be exploited to perform work.

Because of the second law of Thermodynamics, the thermodynamic gradient will be reduced over time and global entropy will be increased.

Which again I pointed out in post 197 when I said:

To be a true perpetual motion machine it can not have a fuel source. You f-ing dim wits where muddling around it when you where harping on about the second law of thermal dynamics.. which is why i wanted you to explain what that law was because if you had you would have identified the earths heat as a outside power source which does not fit the definition of a perpetual motion machine.

I left myself wide open for what? 3 or 4 days now with a legit way to shut Me up topically, and not one of you where smart enough to find and use that option... rather I want each of you to look at the bull shit you posted and be ashamed of yourself for calling anyone stupid if you yourself did not find this key.

Shame on you for using closed minded tactics of trying to ad hoc kill the messenger rather than scientifically address the content of the message.

Nice of you to FINALLY catch up. You are not all of the way there yet but if you keep reading I ask before you explain the second law first define entropy.. why because again the off set of entropy is fuel. if you had this definition of the second law and knew really understood entropy, and knew the off set was fuel then the 2nd law becomes moot point and your attack/diagnosis of my machine turn to the fact that it uses fuel which does not comply with the definition of a PMM.

any one with a pulse who understands this would not even need to mention the 2nd law of TD because entropy is being compensated for by the addition of an external power source eg fuel. So again it is stupid to reference the 2nd law AT ALL if you had any understanding of this... let alone do so for 10 days while I am screaming fuel disqualifies the machine, at you.

This is proof positive you were completely oblivious to a topic I make a living on. and despite my personal knowledge and ALL of the points of reference I posted you obstinately held your position and argued against known science and technology simply because I sourced the material. With nothing but faith in yourself and faith that you are smarter than me to hold on to. this is the only way you could tell yourself it is ok to ignore the dozen or so points of reference I provided... Not only that it was faith in your own ego that kept you from accepting my own analysis of my own machine and why it failed as a PMM.
here we are 10 days later and you are just now beginning to understand because i had to beat it out of you. doing so with documented science and technology that you thought you were using to teach me something... Too bad for you these posts are recorded and locked in over time. otherwise you would undoubtly go back to where you thought you had a foot hold in the conversation and reargue a different point. (If you are looking for that point it was 10 days ago before post 197) and yet you were still arguing the 2nd law.

Can you see my frustration by being belittle by someone who is almost two weeks behind me in her ability to reason? that her deficiencies and ignorance is attributed to me when ever she gets an opportunity to do so?

Again i do this not to personally humiliate you albeit there should be at least a little shame if you ever shamed a christian for having faith and ignoring facts and science, as you have been doing. I'm doing this to show all of you because all of you fell into this same pit of ignoring fact for personal belief, and abandoning logic science and the search for truth for an opportunity to attack me personally and ignore the message or anything I said. I wanted to demonstrate that the christians you people ran off for the reason stated did leave because this is a problem here on this site. and more will continue to do so till it is just a bitter pool of god hating misotheists patting each other on the back for out hating the other.