RE: The code that is DNA
December 25, 2019 at 3:28 pm
(This post was last modified: December 25, 2019 at 4:26 pm by John 6IX Breezy.)
(December 25, 2019 at 3:10 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: My excerpts claim otherwise.
Keep in mind I extracted those 4 points from your statement:
"For instance you deny Phylogenie saying that it is just a hypotheses and you say it is not testable. You also seem to claim that relatedness is always an assumption without the absence of known ancestry, which you seem to say that one can't use nucleic acids to prove relatedness."
I wanted to clarify what you were saying. I personally agree that the first 3 points represent my position. The 4th one however, I don't recall having made, at least not in such a manner. I never talk about "proof" in a scientific context for starters.
If you can show me where I made that comment, or something close to it, I'll gladly withdraw that claim. Until then Im treating it as a straw man.