RE: The code that is DNA
December 25, 2019 at 6:33 pm
(This post was last modified: December 25, 2019 at 7:12 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(December 25, 2019 at 6:24 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Yes, all animals that create a lower order will still be whatever they were. We didn't cease to be primates when we became human.Guy thinks Richard Lenski was trying to make fruit flies not fruit flies missing the point of the fruit fly experiment
Cladogenesis is a whole different beast, where higher order are created - and we've observed that in the lab and in the field as well.
You're relying on the information of people who have declared what can be shown to happen...impossible. Is this a requirement of your christianity, perhaps? That a christian must utterly reject observable phenomena?
Even funnier when one considers Richard Lenski fully accepts the mainstream view of evolution. And is a critic of ID and Creationism.
Quote:The category of phylogeny or evolutionary tress, if such a phrase exists, would be just that—a lexical category under which specific hypothesis are grouped. I agree it is not a hypothesis in much the same way that the category for fruits, is not itself a fruit, its just a category.Nope not even close
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM