RE: The code that is DNA
December 28, 2019 at 3:29 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2019 at 3:31 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Take a second Look at Gae's original statement, which you gave a kudos to:Because it is for right now these are the facts they are not in serious dispute among the majority of people who understand them .If some fact down he line changes that i's irrelevant to what is he case now .You don't get to dismiss the facts now on some off chance something will come along to challenge them later.
"...it's pointless to argue against facts, correct?"
If I'm the one insinuating notions of absolute certainty and absolute truth, why would Gae consider it pointless to argue against facts?
(December 28, 2019 at 3:11 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:Love how he keeps propping up that flawed probability argument(December 28, 2019 at 2:25 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: That would be considered creation. And if there is no macro evolution and abiogenesis, what would the default be? (Try google the drastic improbability of getting a simple protein to form let alone multiple complex ones)
Why are you assuming there is a default? And, on what evidence have you determined that default to be god? How did god design and create DNA, Yukon? Or, are you just going to continue to ignore the question?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM