RE: The code that is DNA
December 29, 2019 at 12:16 am
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2019 at 12:21 am by Abaddon_ire.)
And let us roll that out for a moment. The christians are already christians. You are clearly not addressing them.
The atheists frankly dont care much about your idiotic position.
So to whom are you addressing your spurious baloney?
I suggest that your target audience is yourself. Your "faith" is so fragile that you have to somehow shore it up. By any means. Is it not sad that one's beliefs are so utterly weak? Do you never question those beliefs?
Of course not, because your "god" is watching your every move, indeed your very thoughts.
Guess what. So is santa.
That is how trivial your faith really is.
Feet to the flames. Is it your position that no speciation has ever been observed. Yes or no.
(You will dodge that, I know)
The atheists frankly dont care much about your idiotic position.
So to whom are you addressing your spurious baloney?
I suggest that your target audience is yourself. Your "faith" is so fragile that you have to somehow shore it up. By any means. Is it not sad that one's beliefs are so utterly weak? Do you never question those beliefs?
Of course not, because your "god" is watching your every move, indeed your very thoughts.
Guess what. So is santa.
That is how trivial your faith really is.
(December 29, 2019 at 12:16 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote:(December 29, 2019 at 12:12 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Yes, each successive representative in a line could likely mate with the previous one. This has already been addressed...repeatedly...and is not an objection to speciation, or the definition of species.
Do you have an objection to speciation, an event that we have observed in the lab and the field...or not?
See this is what I mean lol. You asked what the issue is, I told you, and then it doesn't matter unless the issue is specifically what you want it to be.
Feet to the flames. Is it your position that no speciation has ever been observed. Yes or no.
(You will dodge that, I know)