RE: The code that is DNA
December 30, 2019 at 10:50 am
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2019 at 11:36 am by Mister Agenda.)
(December 28, 2019 at 6:31 pm)Yukon_Jack Wrote: Then how do you account for only mutant fruit flies in over 30k generations and zilch for macro evolution?
It would take centuries for 30K fruit fly generations to pass, the longest running fruit fly experiment was about 60 years and that was only about 1,500 generations. They were kept in the dark and developed a keener sense of smell and longer head bristles that were helpful for navigating in the dark. It would take about 1,200 years for the experiment to have observed 30,000 generations.
(December 29, 2019 at 3:49 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Please stop this childlish nonsense, nothing forces God to make a perfect product. If you don't think so, you must demonstrate that a god must make perfect beings.
A perfect designer can create an imperfect product if it wants to, but one can't reasonably infer a perfect designer from an imperfect design.
A clarification that may help going forward:
straw man
1. an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.
Getting your interlocutor's position wrong is not in itself a straw man, it can be an honest mistake, perhaps an inference based on too little information, such as when the other person's actual position is unclear.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.