RE: The code that is DNA
January 9, 2020 at 2:19 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2020 at 2:21 pm by Yukon_Jack.)
According to Sungula, anyone can make any claim about someone that is unsubstantiated and that’s ok.
That’s libelous, see how far that gets you, it doesn’t work on me or anyone w an honest brain.
so for the record, Tour made NO straw man and Sungula is a dishonest atheist for saying so
NO straw man whatsoever. Mutations are TOTALLY random. Do you understand Darwinism don’t you?
That’s libelous, see how far that gets you, it doesn’t work on me or anyone w an honest brain.
so for the record, Tour made NO straw man and Sungula is a dishonest atheist for saying so
(January 8, 2020 at 12:17 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: If he indicated in the video that if nature produced the 'machinery of cells' through random processes; that would be a mischaracterization of biological evolution, natural selection would have been key to that development and it's not random at all. As a mischaracterization of the actual claim of the theory, it would be a strawman.
NO straw man whatsoever. Mutations are TOTALLY random. Do you understand Darwinism don’t you?