RE: The code that is DNA
January 9, 2020 at 5:23 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2020 at 5:27 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:According to Sungula, anyone can make any claim about someone that is unsubstantiated and that’s ok.
Nope but you can state facts then not caring about some triggered creationists whining and table thumping is okay
Quote:That’s libelous, see how far that gets you, it doesn’t work on me or anyone w an honest brain.Nope and so far he fa remains a fact despite your ineffective whinging and you wouldn't comprehend honesty if i bit you in the balls
Quote:so for the record, Tour made a straw man and Sungula is a honest atheist for saying so and i'm a triggered creationist crybaby who dislikes my corrupt heroes being honestly criticized and goes on silly crusades when people do so.There fixed that statement
Quote:Do you understand Darwinism don’t you?
(January 8, 2020 at 12:17 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: If he indicated in the video that if nature produced the 'machinery of cells' through random processes; that would be a mischaracterization of biological evolution, natural selection would have been key to that development and it's not random at all. As a mischaracterization of the actual claim of the theory, it would be a strawman.Get a load of his response
The irony is hilarious
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM