(December 3, 2019 at 4:56 am)Haipule Wrote: Aloha AF:
There is a long standing argument about what came first, the chicken or the egg. Why does everyone forget about the rooster? Without the rooster, all you can get is over easy or, an omelet. Without fertilization, there is no chick! They would die out in one generation. The difference between egg and poultry production is fertilization--ROOSTER. HELLO!
Therefore, there can be no female with out a male and the male came first! And that, without a female, according to Genesis. Or, are you going in invent the magic female. Birds, bees, flowers and trees. Without all, at roughly same time, there is non. Right?
So Adam was first. Does this make sense?
The last things on the geologic time scale are homosapians(humans as we now know them) and flowers(as we now know them). They NEVER existed before as they do now and never have changed since--geologic time scale as observed science! Oh sure, micro, but not mcrel. Adaptation vs Radical. Yes, but radical has never been observed, OBSERVED, friend. EVER!
Well Bill, we gots this here 'hypothesis' thingy! And we don't give a shit about roosters!
Only to His glory, Bill
1. You understand that a rooster is a chicken, right?
2. What about parthenogenesis?
3. What downbeatplumb said.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
