[Serious] Giordano Bruno

[brewer]

Wow, thanks for the recap and claiming the win, because none of the rest of us can think for ourselves or come to our own conclusions about something that doesn't mean squat in the real world. It's just so much mental masturbation that the internet is known for.

Do you feel better now, or at least better than me?

If you're going to be arguing about facts in history, it's generally better to read the sources. 

It's clear that you didn't read the Stanford page carefully. You've announced that you're not willing to read Tim O'Neill's writing. You didn't read the carefully presented research on the Renaissance Mathematicus blog that I linked to. You haven't read the books by Yates or Rowland. You clearly haven't read Bruno's original work. You haven't given us any reason to think that you have researched this at all. 

Now you've switched over into personal insults.

A comment on your assumed superiority. If you want to consider it an insult, not my problem.

I don't have to read anything you post to have an opinion. As far as I'm concerned your and Tim are wrong and the catholic church did include his science positions/thought in their inquisition.

I will insult you with this, much of what you consider important does not mean squat in the real world. I came to the forum mostly for shits and giggles, apparently you came to pump up your self esteem.