[Serious] Giordano Bruno

[Belacqua]

I didn't declare victory, I said you didn't get to.

Time for you to run off and get your panties in a twist over something else that, in the grand scheme of things, does not matter.

It's kind of you to be concerned about the state of my underwear. I can assure you they're in reasonably good condition. (Cotton boxers from Uniqlo, 3 for 1000 yen!)

At this point I'm curious about why you were so sure earlier that Bruno was a martyr for science. Especially because, as you say, it doesn't affect the grand scheme of things. 

It looks as though FakeMessiah said Bruno was a martyr for science, and then I said he wasn't, and this prompted you to decide that I was wrong, despite the fact that you had never heard of Bruno before. In an honest disagreement about historical facts, we could decide the truth with reasonable confidence if we refer to the relevant documents. But you had made up your mind completely before you knew anything at all about the case. 

I find this way of deciding issues of fact to be strange.