Was the condemnation of man justified?

[Drich]

i think you have a medieval understanding of condemnation. you see morality and condemation as a measure of self value or worth in relation to a standard you will never measure up to. when in fact sin or the identification of sin in a person is handled by God more like how we handle an infection or virus.
 
his sacrifice was the only thing that would yield a vaccine/cure. all God then required to have access to this vaccine/cure is simply acknowledgement of the cost, and who provided it.
this is why i said God sees sin more like how we handle a virus. God is not concerned in how or what mild activity you were doing when you contracted the virus, just the fact that you test positive. if you test positive you must then be 'cleansed' of the infection before you are allowed to go in with those who are not infected/heaven.
yes there is a cure for every sin. but to have access to it God asks that you first respect the one who provided this gift to you.
only to the unjust. for me who have been cured it would be unjust that God allowed the infected to comingle with the uninfected.
innocents has nothing to do with infection .
you are infected who cares why. bottom line is your infection will consume you and those around you if not treated.

Deflect so as to ignore the topic. More of your Christian hipocracy and lies. 

I do agree that your god is like a virus.

He belongs in virus hell.

Strange that your faith is so slight that you would restrict how your god can punish, or not.

Regards
DL

what a lazy half hearted rebuttal. i went line by line equating every precept you scribbled out and paired it with an easy to understand in modern term yet comparable exegesis of the bible narrative. I took concepts you were butchering with a seeming elementary catholic pov, and dragged you back to a bible based understanding of sin. and all you do is move to dismiss because seeming you are not prepared to have this discussion when it make sense to you. i understand if you can keep the idea od sin clouded in mystery and foolishness there is no reason to address it. but here's the thing. I did not ignore the topic, i spoke on it point by point refuting you understanding of how sin works. what you have identified is being off topic is in fact a rebuttal that collapses your whole argument/objection. it is not off topic it shows you are ill informed and do not have a foundational understanding of sin. which i in turn gave you one.