(May 11, 2021 at 1:49 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: There are risks on either side of the aisle here. You are taking a risk by not getting vaccinated, and you are likewise taking a risk by being vaccinated. These risks are often not communicated; and its painfully obvious that many people that are in favor of vaccines, are simply hiding behind the label of "vaccine" as if it carried special powers. This isn't a traditional vaccine; it is perhaps only a vaccine in function but not in kind, the effects of which are still under investigation.
Take for example a recent issue that is being discussed about the spike proteins found both in the virus and the vaccine: Its uncertain whether the spike proteins in the vaccine can cause damage. Its uncertain what happens if the vaccines leaves the intermuscular tissue and enters the lungs. More importantly, its uncertain what the long terms effects of the vaccine are. (Note: The article I linked attempts to address these questions and argue why the vaccine is safe, but it does so because these are genuine concerns that we are stumbling across.)
My point is this: These are question that are currently being asked and researched while people are already taking the vaccines. Pretending that we already know the answers, and that those hesitating to get vaccinated are ignorant, is the wrong approach.
Risks on both sides?
Wait?
What 'Both sides'?
Where's the 'Other side'?
Has the Virus formed its own political party all of a sudden?
Do you acknowledge that if a person contracts this cirus they have litterally/effectivly 'Chance' to survive it?
Their body/immune system will have NO warnings or defenses against it?
I don't think I'm being hyperbolic and I am pretty sure my comments are not 'Incorrect', either.
