(November 3, 2021 at 12:12 pm)GaryAnderson Wrote:(November 3, 2021 at 12:10 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: You don't realize how the first part of the sentence is incoherent with respect to the second - but I want to point out that you mis-titled this thread.Oh no no no, I just want to see how tolerant you are and that science doesn’t belong just to you, but to all humanity.
What you really wanted to know was who owned faithing. Have at it, it's all yours?
It does, in many aspects, belong to humanity but if used inappropriately to come to non science conclusions then the validity of those conclusions should be questioned.
The theists who reference science for god arguments are simply validating that their faith can't stand on it's own. If god(s) actually existed as more than a concept then god (and it's religion) would not need to use science (incorrectly) to be convincing.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.