RE: Illustrating the burden of proof - pay me!
February 7, 2022 at 4:30 pm
(This post was last modified: February 7, 2022 at 4:32 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Also it should be noted that burden of proof demands are inconsistently applied, especially on partisan sites like this one.No, it was unchallenged because why bother challenging something everyone else knows is false? Some claims aren't even wrong thus can be dismissed unchallenged. As to whether the person felt the burden of not is irrelevant. No inconsistency or partisanship there I'm afraid
A few days ago someone here asserted that no religion had ever done a positive thing, ever in history. This ludicrous remark sailed by unchallenged because it conforms with local prejudices.
Somehow that poster didn't feel his burden at all.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
